Lessig Bets ‘Wikipedia’ Approach Will Transubstantiate Congress
So, what color will be upon for fellow members of congress using up the toast and not postdating through? I envisage this would be the most mutual color…
good i conceive thats a good style, to chase after and get certain those who we set in powerfulness are making the affair that we place them in powerfulness to do! but i still feel like i need more information on this theme...
How about wiki-legislation where the line community of interests can trade the existent statute law. Go forth extinct pal lobbiest who essay for there own interests. Let the people mouth on what is truly of import and let the congress be accountable for occupying activeness. Then wiki-fucking-hang them by screening how they are balloting against the involvement of the citizens who composed the statute law by favouring the people who afford them money for their vote against it.
Hold with batrhyme. I have the like thought in mind. So big I am not American, otherwise we may work unitedly to start out a wiki-legislation.
Full thought! I want to regress big statute law for conflicts of involvement.
Of class, then the job will be how the elite demowikipublican cabal eschews ordinary subscribers…
There is only one fashion to trim down government corruptness. Trim the size of government and there will be no reason to purchase politicians. Individual American who anticipate the residuum of their lad citizens to attain into their pouch to bail them extinct should be defeated, like as the corps who want our hard currency. Restricted government is the inheritance of the Laminitis, and the promise of America’s future.
Patch we’re at it, wherefore not get committedness to trim back the jerky manuvering of the Business firm and US Senate Rules to hold critical statute law “bottled up” so that it cannot get an “up or down vote” of all fellow members. To witticism: Consent / or non-Consent of Juridical namings, and the communication theory monitoring bill (among legion others) in the show Congress.
Legislaters are renowned for expression one affair and making the opposite. Occupying money from lobbyist and PAC is not effectual today. We have public financing for the presidential subspecies and what mess that is. As far as complete transparence of singles of congress good luck. I do even so like the consept. moose
If politicians fulfilled their promises, then what would they have to assure in the next election?
Public financing sounds like a good mode to afford powerfulness back to the Small Bozos, but it but custody the campaign purse string section to the incumbent politicians. We’re talk about politicians disbursement Former People’s Money to fund their own reelection! And you can wager that they will maintain public money extinct of their challengers’ custody with a labyrinth of support demands under the pretext of “guardianship the Canadian dollars extinct.” When politicians get their own rules, you get thing like the Democrat’s undemocratic superdelegates..
Wikipeida, in of it’s self and it’s intragroup system of control condition is perfectly corrupt and undependable. Wikipeida is not a trusty origin of info.
I hope Congress revisits Subdivision 230 of the CDA of 1996 and redefine Wikipeida as a “message supplier” and get answer for it’s misinformation and obloquy of people’s reputes.
Right today Wikipeida and it’s 15 twelvemonth older, redbull fueled goon decision makers are nowadays unassailable and extinct of control condition and should not be sure
You Can Not Purchase the current Coevals of Political leaders.
YOU CAN ONLY Leased THEM!
The next high cancelled coming up through the doorway brings forth an instant, staff apologized, “fitting” in Place, based on ‘extensive Staff research’.
Any adjustment to Rule is OK, if it increases finances uncommitted for re-election!
Re-election for most current Political leaders is their Existent God!
Ethically disputed Corps, and Lobbyists (oxymoron’s) milk this regretful system to the maximum.
It permits such interests to easy deviate significant Taxpayer Money to their own personal lacunas - e.g. through Earmarks, No-bid Contracts, fillet any honorable congressional try to restrict or stop truly big procurance programs, etc
It too ofttimes renders easy twenty to solar day access to the incumbent’s business office and staff for such ‘highly valued’ subscribers.
This simplifies acquiring the Contributor’s Profit docket into the incumbent or candidate’s Congress or US Senate Bill coevals/circumstance process.
Regards
Brillig
I concord that to insure this country’s government clay Democratic (by the people, etc.), this suggested system is executable. Even so, a lot of national elections are set up by the Fundamental law and Pentateuch to NOT be straight commanded by the public for the intention of the final results worked by the most enlightened Voter electors, as well by The Federalist Document of the 1780’s. As an aside, realize Federalist No. 10 against “peculiar involvements”. The Electoral College is written of fellow members not even needed to vote the manner the public wishes them to. Is this system suggesting ever the Fundamental law and its current interpretative Torah? Referring Congressional fellow members who use up a toast and do not postdate through, is there a way for the fellow member to explicate his reasonning out? Political conclusions are not ever black-and-white; a hope can be got one four hours with one set of portion, and changed the next with novel fortune, ofttimes without account to the public or an account that fulfils all. Having the “brushing changes” everyone wants, I concur that the Republican Congress of the 1990’s flew the coop amok and dwelt and squandered scads of my money. Withal, when makes the alteration end, when is the alteration enough, and when is everyone travelling to be slaked with the event? Plus, are we genuinely locution that we want the public to work how the government is launched and broke away, when that like public is more concerned in observance football game, imbibing beer, and only acquires their political word from loud mouth slanted origins like the Slyboots Word web (notoriously conservative and annoyingly loud)? In decision, this suggested system is a good first at least; but we should in all probability “go forth the of import material to the experts”, demur only the singles who do the “right” matter.
How about the committedness to Shrivel Regime??? Less Taxes, Less Outlay, Less Ordinance, Less Intervention in Our Lives? How about a novel committedness to the Fundamental law, and its Rules of Regime? A move away from Socialist economy! No intervention in Mercantilism, no intervention in people’s personal livings. Then I’d support this thought, but not at the disbursement of more personal exemptions and great government control all over thing like Wellness Care, Teaching, & Personal Choice that makes not harm some other human being.
I like it! We need answerableness in government. I could rant on a tan but this is a step in a good way. Step up people.
I like it! We need answerableness in government. I could rant on a tan but this is a step in a good way. Step up people.
Without corporate money, a campaigner cannot win an election.
What needs to be through with is to construct a 100 bucks box that take Black pine BitTorrent RSS gives to the TV and have it so easy to utilise any grand mother can utilise it with a distant control condition only. To convey individualised TV to everyone and have that use up all over the current culture mediums control by cable, nationnal, satellite tv channel. Cause corporate campaign donations go to give for advertisement on those TV transmission channel. So if you take the demand to advertize on those channel to arrive at the whole universe with political thoughts, then there is no need for corporate campaign donations.
Public financing is a sham. Look at a province like Pine Tree State where it’s in place for the legislative body. Legislative caucuses run campaigns that are simply as flat and manipulative as anywhere else, demur there is less answerableness and transparence.
All the alleged “campaign finance reform” to date stamp has had got the rule effect of “professionalising” political political campaigns by devising the procedure impossible for amateurs - manque “citizen legislators - to take part. Incumbent legislators (and Congress) run their establishments as corrupt “incumbent protective covering rackets.”
Public financing would only exasperate all that, and decline the systemic disfunctions, not cure them.
How lots is George Soros contributory to the task, BTW?
How about a nexus to where we can get mired?
This system is already in place. It’s named downsizedc.org
It’s a Congressional agreement meeting place that makes it easy for citizens to have a dialouge with their elective functionaries.
You can as well opt-in to mail from the land site that update you on current issues.
Is there any point to this if we maintain electing thieves and base criminals to business office? Makes it truly affair whether they are owned by corps or by peculiar involvement groups?
There is less than a smattering of elective politicians who respect my autonomies, the residue have no interest in obeying the Fundamental law. I can already get wind the resistance utterring the “it’s an inhabitting, respiring document” nonsense and I ever wonder if they have any luck with that logical system in a polite tribunal (”your honor, this contract is a ‘living breathing’ document, I should not be kept apt for not safekeeping up my end…”).
If we maintain vote for the like set, it merely makes not affair who pecuniary resource their re-elections. We will keep to get what we merit, interpreters who purchase our votes with our own money, an un-Constitutional government that is not reticent by anything former than persuasion poll. Even if this system were in place, the federal government would still rack half of my doing work living to finance un-Constitutional plans and wars. They would still go against my autonomies by applying un-Constitutional drug Pentateuch, money laundering ordinances. We would still be misplacing our holding rights, our right to populate as we take, elevate our houses as we desire and prepare ourselves in the way we want.
All of this is but re-arranging the pack of cards chairs on the Titanic.
fred, bad it’s not more lucid — the nexus is at change-congress.org
As Saint Christopher tells above, it’s not so black and snowy. For representative, in Golden State, the talker of the firm is Fabian Nez. Political action committee that want favors do not have to yield hard cash direct to Nez. The Political action committee bestow to “brotherly loves” like “The Fabian Nez Toy Drive.” Fabian pushes Political action committee statute law spell indirectly going across extinct playthings to his components that finally leads to his re-election, patch never breakage his “pledge to decline Political action committee money.” Lobbyist and politicians will ever chance slipways to wash bribes.
Bodied money is evil - unless it’s Google Inc’s corporate money.
Then Professor.Lessig is felicitous to be a marionette for corporate money.
Full luck with that!
Even if of all time political leader abode by with all these pledges, the money would simply be nonrecreational into amounted Swiss accounts, but like in Tierce Macrocosm nations (as ours is on the manner to decent).
The debut sayes:
“amusement industry’s vice-like grip”
It should say:
“amusement industry’s vise-like clutch”
A bench vise is a mechanically skillful twist for retention something tightly.
A frailty is an interest you have that others reject of.
“vice-like grip” has pun value in this linguistic context, but is incorrect in fact.
wikipedia is the best i believe, but i am genuinely upset it will change like hayseed and google. http://www.opentopix.com/subject/tech-news/wikipedia-questions-path-to-more-money
“This Change Congress map will present that in fact, something significant tin be through. Nowadays.”
Unluckily, what it will in all likelihood present is that a valued function can be made that is all guck, and that congress, confronted on the one paw with a walkaway in the hay with a paid for companion, a “investigatory slip” in the Bahama Islands, and 20 000 000 for their local economic system… will bump that some website’s map color transports just about zero weight in comparing.
The existent job here is an extinct of control condition government that no recollective views itself sprang by the fundamental law. We have been dwelling in a 3rd universe Stalinism for some months today, and every four hour period, the divergences get less and less.
How will we get the mercantilism article accepted once again? How can we stop congress from fashioning ex post facto Torah? How can we stop them from contravening our right to hold and give birth weapons system? How will we stop them from running afoul our right to unloosen address? How can we stop them from rental the executive and teh bench run vicious all over the jurisprudence and the organic law?
These are the of import enquiries of the mean solar day, and they have no answers that chance aspect in any political procedure uncommitted to us.
That is where your spiritlessness comes up from. And that is where your loser will come up from.
…Prof Lessig wants legislators to assure to do four thing that he tells will trim down the influence of money on policymaking: (1) To assure not to have money from lobbyists and political activity commissions; (2) support public financing of elections; (3) pull to go through statute law to for good ban the funneling of money to their districts’ juts out of refutable worth; (4) and to pull to “obligate transparence in the working of congress.” …
These are highly obscure conceptions. I promise this protrude is destined to unsuccessful person.
1 - What if I were to ask for 25 business organization associates to a dinner party political party, and the campaigner goes to the political party and haves personal campaign shares from every attendant. Have I but made a political activity commission? What if 20 of those 25 made the like? Do you believe the representative will answer my calls and hear to my “concerns”?
2 - Wherefore should my congress soul vote to afford away my tax money to every Nut who wants to scat for business office? Free campaign money will only get the choice of campaigners a good deal more puzzling. In fact, today that money is uncommitted, I conceive I will run for business office excessively.
3 - “juts of refutable worth”???? Who is laid in charge of determinative what is of confutable worth? The people of the territory to have the labor? Or the local jurisprudence prof who wants to transubstantiate congress?
4 - “oblige transparence”. Wow, what a conception. Have you of all time kept an eye on an urban center council group meeting on telecasting? Good, that is stimulating equated to the piece of work of the US Congress of the Joined Provinces.
This is merely some other big pipe dream. In my thought.
“The labor has two prayer — Republican used up all over congress in 1994 with alike hopes of brushing change. As Interior Diary has exhaustively attested, plenty of of those promises were not fulfilled.”
The language “Home Diary” are coupled to the main site for the mag Interior Diary. This is not an acceptable commendation for demoing that a lot of promises of the 1994 “Contract with of America” program were not fulfilled. I’m not differring with the fact itself, but you ca not name a _mag_ to turn up an immense, brushing asseveration like that.
Thanks for occupying the clip to point out, JS. I was really bringing up to a covert narrative that followed the destiny of the congresswomen who were voted in on those promises. The narration followed their careers and instanced how those promises but liquified away, and they merely got part of the DC formation or went away DC altogether.
The clause was notable because its premise addresses the fundamental question of how one can alter an establishment spell being part of its machinery.
Some other mad strategy from Larry Lessig. I feel bad for the hapless psyches who divide themselves from USD 500,000 to back up a task that could be run for USD 2,000 on a shared out hosting site.
This could be an alternative to balloting DRIP - Do not Return Incumbent Politicos
so they want campaigners to assure not to have campaign donations from lobbyists or peculiar involvements…
until now, they plan to set out doing work to funnel money towards nominees who embrace the toasts, a la EMILY’s List… (fyi, per the EMILY’s List internet site, they “brought all over USD 11 000 000″ to campaigner in the ‘06 cycle)…
anyone else understand a disconnection here?
i guess it’s not a job for nominees to occupy money from interest groups if you occur to concord with them…
You held my support until you referred your support for Al Gore and his inconvenient prevarication about planetary warming up. You today have zeroed in credibleness in my book. Full luck with swirled pea plants.
Carry the Congress, then make a fencing earlier they sneak back in!
Really, I genuinely believe that we should take back two well and dead on target penalties for simply polititions - public flagellation for misdomenors and public Crucifixion for felonies.